Skip to main content

What Makes President Donald Trump Tick? An Operational Profile Of The US President


Major nations always make intelligence assessments of both friendly and opposition leaders. In most instances these analyses are required to be simple, direct, and where possible, in unbiased terms. What follows is an attempt to reproduce such an analysis.

While Donald Trump was never in military service, he did graduate from military school. He never forgot that experience. In fact there are indications that in his mind his military school background is equivalent to actual military service. There are those among his detractors who suggest that such self supportive fantasy exists generally within his thought process. This is a phenomenon of projection not unknown among political leaders. His actual psychological makeup tends to be analyzed depending upon the source's political orientation. One thing appears to be an area ofagreement: Donald Trump is a far more complicated personality than he allows himself to appear.

"The Donald" is clearly a big man in size, and likes to consider himself athletic. He played varsity football in high school and reportedly did rather well. Now he devotes his sports energies to golf which he is characterized as playing with considerable seriousness - when he wishes to – even though he takes advantage of travelling the course in his golf cart. In other words, President Trump not only likes to think of himself as an energetic male, he vigorously pursues that self-characterization. The fact is that this demeanor keeps both his staff and detractors on their toes. It is really a very effective device and he clearly enjoys the image.


The military school influence has been carried on quite consciously in President Trump's return salutes to the ever-present military escorts. The salute is straight out of cadet protocol: "Five fingers extended and joined snapped at a 45 degree angle to the edge of the right eyebrow." It's very impressive. Other presidents tended to a sort of wave somewhere in the region of the side of the head – if returning the salute at all. Donald Trump takes his role as Commander-in-Chief quite seriously and appears proud of his salute.

External symbols such as the salute suggest something more important. Donald Trump is extremely conscious of his position and rank, far more than a man of his accomplishments might be expected to be. Harry Truman certainly wasn't and Dwight Eisenhower took his presidential rank for granted. Lyndon Johnson may have been far closer in his self-perception to Donald Trump than the latter would be willing to accept. The fact is that Johnson's political flamboyance combined with Nixon's calculative ways and an added combination of both men's manipulative character is as close as one can come to a modern comparison with Trump. Indeed Trump's perception of himself is well indicated in many other ways. His need to be in close proximity to family and supportive aides is matched by a tendency to require intellectual support of recognized intelligent "tough guys". In this latter case he has chosen some of the best.

President Trump's top military team, Kelly, Mattis, and Dunford is truly exceptional. They are now augmented by Mike Pompeo with his broad-based training and experience. John Bolton as National Security Advisor remains a question mark primarily because of his long record of consistent rigidity. In that he is an American version of Sergei Lavrov. His top military cadre makes Donald Trump as influential in world leadership as he is. It is not President Trump's personal talent that gives him the "edge", but it is his capability to choose these defense personalities that causes opposing national executives to hesitate in physical opposition to the United States. Unfortunately for Mr. Trump his military team is not matched by other leaders in his government, and that, too, is well known by his foreign adversaries.

With all that being said Donald Trump still is vulnerable on a personal basis. His most obvious failing is his obvious and overwhelming ego. He just doesn't have the ability – or perhaps interest – in self-criticism. In fact President Trump tends to eschew self-criticism as an indication of weakness. Basically, weakness in any form appears to be perceived as a danger. He gives every indication that weakness in others is a characteristic to be exploited and thus seeks to hide any perception of similarity in himself. In this he utilizes several devices including exaggerated terminology and flamboyant claims. He becomes fixated on an idea and cannot be moved. An example has been his persistence in creating a new service, Space Force, in spite of vigorous objection of Secretary of Defence Mattis.

Perhaps Donald Trump's most outstanding characteristic as president is his knowledge of finance and commerce. Aside from Herbert Hoover's nineteen years in international mining and engineering activities, Donald Trump has few peers in business management in U.S. presidential history. Trump knows the civilian world of business and uses that knowledge at every possible occasion – domestic and foreign. This, of course, makes him a powerful opponent on the world scene and he utilizes that status to gain advantage wherever he can. Unfortunately for him the other world leaders have their own brilliant aides to counter Trump's self- perception as a dominant negotiator. It's really not that mano y mano game that President Trump seeks to believe it is.

Donald Trump's perception is that foreign affairs and even defense policy can be defined in the context of his essential strength of commercial/economic negotiation. It is a unique device, though therefore easily analyzed. The most interesting element of this characterization is that Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping know all these elements of Mr. Trump's makeup very well. How much he is aware of their insight remains a question. However, knowing with what President Trump is endowed does not create an advantage for them any more than it does for him in reverse. The real issue for him and them is how the knowledge is utilized. The truth is that other world leaders -- both major and minor – find themselves at a disadvantage in dealing with an American president who is part politician, part business tycoon and part television performer. One wonders if Mr. Trump is himself aware of this image he projects.

Ultimately President Donald Trump is most fearful of any indication of weakness or vulnerability of his own. This basic fear is what pushes him towards extravagant statements. Whether this defense mechanism will someday push him to similar "extravagant" action remains to be seen.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Isis, Islam, Intervention

Reality on the ground is often quite different than what appears in news commentary and even Executive Department briefing papers. This is essentially true regarding terrorism in general. The statement has been made that ISIS has been effectively defeated in Syria and the Taliban reduced in strength in Afghanistan. These are the reasons for withdrawing U.S. military forces from these combat areas. Unfortunately, such a definitive circumstance is belied by the reality on the ground. To begin with, the various organized terrorist groups in the Middle East may have different names and even sponsors, but they all share the same strategic goal. They are all Islamic in character, desire to remove western influence/control from a chosen sector – and in one form or another ultimately gain dominance over economic assets such as oil production and sale. Sometimes the real ambition is simply to gain unrestricted power for power's sake. To complicate things further, the number of “soldie...

Anatomy Of Terrorism

It is said that terrorism is the weapon of the weak against the strong. It's a saying that sounds good if one is seeking to defend or justify terrorist acts. However, it is just not true – at least if one is willing to consider blowing up a peaceful civilian structure as a terrorist act. The civilians in the building are hardly strong: they are defenseless and unprepared. The real strength lies with the terrorist bombers. They have all the advantages – weapons, organization, secrecy, initiative and commitment. Terrorism as a device is available to all. It's just a matter of utilizing a particular form of weapon for use in spreading fear while degrading the physical image of a something that is considered as playing part in the maintenance of order in an enemy's infrastructure. This means everything from community activity and edifices to their civil and security services. In other words, destabilizing any aspect of orderly life is a target. Of course, the military is not ...

Russia And China From An Intel Standpoint

It must be a very difficult job to be a Russian or Chinese intelligence officer these days, It's not the strength of the opposition – though of course that's always a consideration. The main reason is the lack of clear purpose. The world - the secret world that they deal in – is much more complicated these days. Sometimes the old enemy for these well-practiced operators is viewed differently by the officers' own political superiors. Frankly, it must be very hard to keep up with the changing perceptions of the leader-class who themselves seem to be playing “outside the lines” of historical perceptions. Of course, there is a difference between the two countries, so we will discuss them separately. First, the Russians – While the Western press and novelists (often indistinguishable) remain preoccupied with the Russian of previous decades, much has changed both in form and spirit in the Russian security apparat. To begin with, the international charter of what once was th...