Skip to main content

Between A Rock And A Hard Place

Image
By

The chances of evolving a new trade agreement with China have become highly questionable - and this is despite fact that both of the leaders of the United States and PRC want the accord. The ongoing struggle by the young people of Hong Kong for freedom and independence of governance was justified by the 1997 statute agreed upon with the U.K. These young people are willing to die and the Chinese authorities, civilian and military, are willing to kill them.

Why has this happened? It has happened because Xi Jinping in order to remain in power must exercise that power by gaining control of all aspects of Hong Kong's existence in civil, military and political terms. Xi has no chance any more than President Trump has any alternative but to condemn China's political military ambition all that they say is in their sphere of influence and legal right. There is no other way to say it: Many in the leadership of China are on the march to establish Imperial China in the convenient totalitarian guise of a communist nation.

The military aspect of the plan has been well thought out and organized. However, is Xi in the political position to influence the tactical aspects of any military or quasi-military action? The answer is a firm, “Who knows? “Security decisions such as those affecting Hong Kong are devices in the hands of the Central Military Commission – of which Xi is the Chairman. The legitimacy of the law under which the PRC is operating now in regard to Hong Kong stems from an ordinance created in 1922 by the British to halt port strikes, then used again in 1967 to end pro-communist riots. This precedent has been noted to Washington and the Trump Administration cannot ignore the legal aspect of the precedent. This legalism may impress Washington and Beijing, but it is far less important than the reality of oppressing the will of the Hong Kong people.

The symbolism of the official action against its own civilians is easily related to the earlier actions of putting down the dissidence of the Uighur minority. The instrument paramount in that action was a special domestic paramilitary unit known as the People’s Armed Police (PAP). This special force is well equipped and trained to forcefully control any form of internal dissidence. The PAP reports to the Central Military Commission (CMC) that administers all the PRC military. Xi Jinping is the Chairman of the CMC! Because of this command structure there has been no way for Xi to disassociate himself from the Hong Kong actions, even if he wanted to.

This chain of command issue has placed the White House in a bind when it comes to creating a friendly view of the contemporary situation that would allow for an even-handed trade negotiation. It certainly forces the American President into a position where his much-heralded friendship with Xi must be sorely tested for Donald Trump's own political status both domestically and internationally.

Of course, Xi could make things much easier for his “friend”, but the Chinese leader would have to sacrifice his strong dominance of Beijing's political scene to do so. At the same time Xi would have to come up with an economic agreement with his U.S. counterpart that the latter can characterize as a valuable deal for the United States.

Obviously, the leadership of the young people of Hong Kong are aware of the difficult position in which they hold Xi who very much needs an advantageous trade deal with the U.S. So far, Xi has shown little or no desire to ameliorate his forces’ actions against the determined HK dissidence. It is possible, of course, for Xi and his Beijing communist leadership to seek some form of friendly outside intervention, but that would not only be an admission of weakness, but also contrary to Chinese law.

The unfortunate possibility exists that the Chinese military, in its several forms, will be pushed to launch a serious physical attack on the Hong Kong protestors. Washington would call for UN intervention to which Beijing would have to react in such a manner that their independence and sovereignty would appear to be challenged.

There is no other way to say it. Beijing and Washington are between a rock and a hard place!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Isis, Islam, Intervention

By
Reality on the ground is often quite different than what appears in news commentary and even Executive Department briefing papers. This is essentially true regarding terrorism in general. The statement has been made that ISIS has been effectively defeated in Syria and the Taliban reduced in strength in Afghanistan. These are the reasons for withdrawing U.S. military forces from these combat areas. Unfortunately, such a definitive circumstance is belied by the reality on the ground. To begin with, the various organized terrorist groups in the Middle East may have different names and even sponsors, but they all share the same strategic goal. They are all Islamic in character, desire to remove western influence/control from a chosen sector – and in one form or another ultimately gain dominance over economic assets such as oil production and sale. Sometimes the real ambition is simply to gain unrestricted power for power's sake. To complicate things further, the number of “soldie...
Post a Comment
Read more

Anatomy Of Terrorism

By
It is said that terrorism is the weapon of the weak against the strong. It's a saying that sounds good if one is seeking to defend or justify terrorist acts. However, it is just not true – at least if one is willing to consider blowing up a peaceful civilian structure as a terrorist act. The civilians in the building are hardly strong: they are defenseless and unprepared. The real strength lies with the terrorist bombers. They have all the advantages – weapons, organization, secrecy, initiative and commitment. Terrorism as a device is available to all. It's just a matter of utilizing a particular form of weapon for use in spreading fear while degrading the physical image of a something that is considered as playing part in the maintenance of order in an enemy's infrastructure. This means everything from community activity and edifices to their civil and security services. In other words, destabilizing any aspect of orderly life is a target. Of course, the military is not ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Russia And China From An Intel Standpoint

By
It must be a very difficult job to be a Russian or Chinese intelligence officer these days, It's not the strength of the opposition – though of course that's always a consideration. The main reason is the lack of clear purpose. The world - the secret world that they deal in – is much more complicated these days. Sometimes the old enemy for these well-practiced operators is viewed differently by the officers' own political superiors. Frankly, it must be very hard to keep up with the changing perceptions of the leader-class who themselves seem to be playing “outside the lines” of historical perceptions. Of course, there is a difference between the two countries, so we will discuss them separately. First, the Russians – While the Western press and novelists (often indistinguishable) remain preoccupied with the Russian of previous decades, much has changed both in form and spirit in the Russian security apparat. To begin with, the international charter of what once was th...
Post a Comment
Read more