Skip to main content

Some Thoughts On North Korea


To begin with, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) is said to be one of the most secretive nations in the world. It's not that North Korea is simply secretive. All countries in one manner or another are secretive. The DPRK, however, tends to be, as the 1939 quote from Winston Churchill about Russia goes “... a mystery wrapped in an enigma”. Importantly, the leadership in Pyongyang enjoys it that way. Of course, for centuries the dominant regime in the northern part of the Korean peninsula was known as “The Hermit Kingdom”. What exists today is merely a modern version of the historic past. The problem that exists in maintaining this character for North Korea is that its relatively young leader Kim Jong Un (age approximately 35) enjoys the international attention - good and bad. Hardly the image of a hermit.

The most important issue for the DPRK is its desire to be recognized as a significant world power. This is the driving force behind Pyongyang's drive for nuclear weapon capability. At the same time, having a nuclear weapon capability is deemed the DPRK's ultimate defense weapon in that its potential use would deter any aggression against their nation. Here is where Washington faces its greatest challenge. Somehow the U.S. must create an environment whereby the leadership in North Korea no longer views the Americans as an existential threat. This begins with Kim Jong Un's personal sense of security.

This then brings us to the question with which the Trump Administration, and past presidencies, have been faced. What can be done to convince the Pyongyang leadership that the U.S. has no desire to oust the government originated by Kim Il Sung in 1948 now led by his grandson. The first steps by President Trump seem to be based on the creation of a personal relationship with Kim Jong Un. The second step obviously must be in the form of something the North would consider a major gift. That surely would have to include – at least in part – major shipments of desperately needed agricultural products for winter provisioning.

The unfortunate fact is that the DPRK has only approximately 15-18% of their country as arable land depending on the source. The rest is all rocky mountainous terrain. This tillable land is far less than required to sustain its population. North Korea is a nation that must rely on importing food stuffs from its southern brothers, China and other friendly sources. In turn the northern portion of the Korean peninsula is rich in minerals available for sale and trade, if the mining process can be technically developed to compete in world markets. It is clear that this is an economy that can work if it is administrated properly. Of this Kim Jong Un and his advisors are well aware. However, they are so bound by the contrary nature of their political economy they cannot and will not for the moment take advantage of the obvious potential of less rigid military and security driven policies.

It is said that the DPRK is a dictatorship. It is certainly true that the Stalinist communist government constructed by Kim Il Sung was just that. However, the leadership structure since then has evolved into something different while at the same time retaining the essence of central control that remains just as strong. In reality, Kim Jong Un does have the same singular power that existed under his father and grandfather. That power, however, is constrained by the existence of several pressure centers that have evolved over past years. In consequence the fracturing of the command structure and the differing personality of the prime leader has led to a broader dispersal of power. Nonetheless, at the same time the basic structure has retained the actual and theoretical dominance of the singular leader. Kim did agree to have his uncle and half-brother assassinated for their roles in an attempted (or perceived) coup. In Western terms, the DPRK power and command structure resembles more of an old Balkan mid-level European monarchy led by an extended family and its friends with the young Kim at its head. Appropriately, Kim Jong Un is now officially titled, “The Great Successor”.

As a result of the foregoing, dealing with today's Kim is in some ways more complex than negotiating would have been under his all-powerful predecessors. There are more constituencies to be satisfied now. In addition, Kim's health is more a factor than his press allows to be seen. He suffers from a glandular-related morbid obesity with all its negative health ramifications, according to Swiss medical personnel who have treated him. The DPRK leader has limited physical capacity to deal with the always demanding factors of directing a modern and complex society. Delegation is therefore a physical as well as political necessity. This is a subject never noted publicly, but well understood by the power centers that already are competing sub rosa for post Kim leadership.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Isis, Islam, Intervention

Reality on the ground is often quite different than what appears in news commentary and even Executive Department briefing papers. This is essentially true regarding terrorism in general. The statement has been made that ISIS has been effectively defeated in Syria and the Taliban reduced in strength in Afghanistan. These are the reasons for withdrawing U.S. military forces from these combat areas. Unfortunately, such a definitive circumstance is belied by the reality on the ground. To begin with, the various organized terrorist groups in the Middle East may have different names and even sponsors, but they all share the same strategic goal. They are all Islamic in character, desire to remove western influence/control from a chosen sector – and in one form or another ultimately gain dominance over economic assets such as oil production and sale. Sometimes the real ambition is simply to gain unrestricted power for power's sake. To complicate things further, the number of “soldie...

Anatomy Of Terrorism

It is said that terrorism is the weapon of the weak against the strong. It's a saying that sounds good if one is seeking to defend or justify terrorist acts. However, it is just not true – at least if one is willing to consider blowing up a peaceful civilian structure as a terrorist act. The civilians in the building are hardly strong: they are defenseless and unprepared. The real strength lies with the terrorist bombers. They have all the advantages – weapons, organization, secrecy, initiative and commitment. Terrorism as a device is available to all. It's just a matter of utilizing a particular form of weapon for use in spreading fear while degrading the physical image of a something that is considered as playing part in the maintenance of order in an enemy's infrastructure. This means everything from community activity and edifices to their civil and security services. In other words, destabilizing any aspect of orderly life is a target. Of course, the military is not ...

Russia And China From An Intel Standpoint

It must be a very difficult job to be a Russian or Chinese intelligence officer these days, It's not the strength of the opposition – though of course that's always a consideration. The main reason is the lack of clear purpose. The world - the secret world that they deal in – is much more complicated these days. Sometimes the old enemy for these well-practiced operators is viewed differently by the officers' own political superiors. Frankly, it must be very hard to keep up with the changing perceptions of the leader-class who themselves seem to be playing “outside the lines” of historical perceptions. Of course, there is a difference between the two countries, so we will discuss them separately. First, the Russians – While the Western press and novelists (often indistinguishable) remain preoccupied with the Russian of previous decades, much has changed both in form and spirit in the Russian security apparat. To begin with, the international charter of what once was th...