Skip to main content

North Korea - What's Next?


There is a big problem with North Korea, but it's far more complicated than one would suspect from reading the recent media coverage. The fact is that Kim Jong-un may be believed to be a dictator, but he really doesn't have the unilateral power that term implies. While Kim may have inherited his position from his father and grandfather, he did not fully inherit their power. Today's Kim may appear to be the sole decision maker in the DPRK. In reality he depends on a coterie of advisors, military and civilian, to guide his reasoning. While he holds the title Chairman, National Defense Commission, which his father Kim Jong Il created in 1998, in practical terms his instincts and decisions are guided by chosen ranking generals as well as intelligence and security chiefs. If that wasn't enough of a hierarchy of politically influential personalities with whom to deal, he also has to defer to guidance he receives from the experienced and astute leader of China (PRC), Xi Jinping, who, with his country's large and modern military, is his and Korea’s ultimate protector.

In consequence of the foregoing, Kim Jong-un really does not have the unilateral strength to do anything other than seek an arrangement with the U.S. that has, at the very least, the appearance of a serious advantage for his country. In this regard there is a further complication. The American position is that the DPRK must totally “denuclearize” its military. In response the U.S. will withdraw all its forces and nuclear capability from South Korea (RoK) thus making the entire Korean Peninsula nuclear free. In addition, the U.S. will remove all economic sanctions as well as funnel needed economic assistance to North Korea. From the Washington standpoint this all appears reasonable. The North Korean view, and the view under which Kim Jong-un operates, is quite different.

To begin with, the entire idea of the DPRK denuding itself of nuclear military power can work only if China and/or Russia are willing and able to provide a nuclear umbrella dedicated to North Korean defense. In turn this arrangement would have to be acceptable to the United States – of which there is no sign. The truth is that the North Korean military counts on the respect it gets as a dangerous and offense-minded foe. They don't want to give up that respect. This is not a matter of simple pride, but an “esprit” that is traceable back to Soviet Russian military strategy and the personal experience of Kim Il Sung (Kim Jong-un's grandfather, the “father” of the DPRK's modern post-WWII state.) The latter learned his military trade first while working with Chinese communist guerillas combating the Japanese invasion and occupation of Manchuria before WWII. Subsequently he received his “graduate” training, politically and militarily, in the Soviet Union during that war, thus providing the model for the post-war creation of the modern North Korean state. The North Korean Army is as it has been since the end of the war against Japan, the center of the DPRK's “continuing revolution”.

Reflecting this evolution is the existence of an increasingly competent and innovative nuclear scientific and technological North Korean capability. The abolishing of Pyongyang's nuclear development and weaponry has to be seen not only as a blow to their military status, but also to their intellectual accomplishment. In effect this is an insult that no North Korean leader could bear and remain leader. Kim Jong-un knows this, and that fact makes it impossible to accept any arrangement with the United States that denudes his country of any form of protection against any type of threat of nuclear attack. In other words, the DPRK sees itself as possibly vulnerable to nuclear blackmail.

Here is the core of the issue: The North Korean leadership, political and military, believes firmly that the Americans ultimately want to punish their country for past actions going all the way back to the Korean War. They think that way because that would be their own view if the roles were reversed. Kim Jong-un may use what has been termed “smiling face diplomacy”, but the bedrock of Pyongyang's defense strategy must be to maintain an ability to deter any outside aggression. In their mind that means the United States with all its power is thus the continuing enemy.

No amount of visits to successful economies such as Vietnam are going to change the basic view that the U.S. continues to be the DPRK's existential enemy. The promise of providing economic benefits in exchange for what is considered an emasculation of North Korea will not change the minds of the well indoctrinated and totally committed North Korean military, intelligence and security leaders. Kim Jong-un cannot and will not change this. Only China and Xi Jinping can convince their “little brother” of anything different – and there is no sign of that happening. To think differently is a “fool's errand”. That is what Donald Trump - with Mike Pompeo's help – came to realize and accept. Time may change things, but in the meanwhile the United States must live with a nuclear-armed DPRK – and Kim Jong-un, along with his politico-military regime, in turn will have to live with the fact that if U.S. satellites determine there are any steps being taken to place nuclear warheads on North Korean missiles, it will be the end of the DPRK as it now physically exists.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Isis, Islam, Intervention

Reality on the ground is often quite different than what appears in news commentary and even Executive Department briefing papers. This is essentially true regarding terrorism in general. The statement has been made that ISIS has been effectively defeated in Syria and the Taliban reduced in strength in Afghanistan. These are the reasons for withdrawing U.S. military forces from these combat areas. Unfortunately, such a definitive circumstance is belied by the reality on the ground. To begin with, the various organized terrorist groups in the Middle East may have different names and even sponsors, but they all share the same strategic goal. They are all Islamic in character, desire to remove western influence/control from a chosen sector – and in one form or another ultimately gain dominance over economic assets such as oil production and sale. Sometimes the real ambition is simply to gain unrestricted power for power's sake. To complicate things further, the number of “soldie...

Russia And China From An Intel Standpoint

It must be a very difficult job to be a Russian or Chinese intelligence officer these days, It's not the strength of the opposition – though of course that's always a consideration. The main reason is the lack of clear purpose. The world - the secret world that they deal in – is much more complicated these days. Sometimes the old enemy for these well-practiced operators is viewed differently by the officers' own political superiors. Frankly, it must be very hard to keep up with the changing perceptions of the leader-class who themselves seem to be playing “outside the lines” of historical perceptions. Of course, there is a difference between the two countries, so we will discuss them separately. First, the Russians – While the Western press and novelists (often indistinguishable) remain preoccupied with the Russian of previous decades, much has changed both in form and spirit in the Russian security apparat. To begin with, the international charter of what once was th...

Anatomy Of Terrorism

It is said that terrorism is the weapon of the weak against the strong. It's a saying that sounds good if one is seeking to defend or justify terrorist acts. However, it is just not true – at least if one is willing to consider blowing up a peaceful civilian structure as a terrorist act. The civilians in the building are hardly strong: they are defenseless and unprepared. The real strength lies with the terrorist bombers. They have all the advantages – weapons, organization, secrecy, initiative and commitment. Terrorism as a device is available to all. It's just a matter of utilizing a particular form of weapon for use in spreading fear while degrading the physical image of a something that is considered as playing part in the maintenance of order in an enemy's infrastructure. This means everything from community activity and edifices to their civil and security services. In other words, destabilizing any aspect of orderly life is a target. Of course, the military is not ...