Skip to main content

China Challenges

Image
By

There is general agreement that Xi Jinping is an excellent negotiator and thus a very good businessman. Certainly, this is the way President Donald Trump has characterized him. If that characterization is accepted, the current crisis involving Hong Kong is clearly not understandable. The attempt unilaterally to alter the agreement reached with Great Britain regarding Hong Kong carries all the elements of a “deal breaker” for the several important trade projects being discussed at the highest levels of the U.S. and China. How can this occur with a supposedly carefully controlled political economy that is the People’s Republic of China (PRC)?

The answer lies in the fact that Xi Jinping really does not sit on top of an administration that is in the total central control envisioned and practiced by Mao Zedong.  On the one hand, such an evolution may seem to carry the seeds of an emerging democratic movement. Unfortunately, this would be an incorrect observation. What is really occurring is the growth of a movement against the leadership of Xi who is viewed in some circles in the PRC as too willing to accede to U.S. interests in general and the machinations of President Donald Trump in particular.

It long has been accepted that there were elements in the Chinese Communist Party that saw the maintenance of Washington and the United States as a permanent adversary on both a political and economic basis. Xi has been successful, so far, in warding off the efforts of the far left – or right – influencing how one views the situation. Ultimately, history indicates that totalitarian regimes of all hues need to have a continuing enemy on which to focus attention in order to maintain political psychological control over their populace.

The fact is that the fifty-year agreement with Great Britain along the lines of “two systems, one country” sounded good but was always vulnerable. The strongest element in the agreement was the economic benefit to China to have a free trade instrument available for Beijing's use as desired. It also was an excellent device for launching foreign intelligence operations for China's external security services. Often these also worked well in reverse for the Western world. Theoretically, it was a win-win situation for all concerned. However, the perception has grown recently in some politically strong circles in the PRC that China was giving up more than it was getting.


The latter situation may have been bound to happen in view of the Chinese Communist Party’s aim to dominate the entire region in one form or another. It's just that this ambition was seen as under attack by Xi Jinping's willingness to engage on an increasingly friendly basis with Washington - justified by the vast financial advantage gained in trade with the U.S. And here is where the problem lies. The opposition forces to Xi needed an issue to divide the Xi/Trump entente. Regaining control over Hong Kong beginning with the new repatriation of “criminals” for legal processing in China was a perfect device. Importantly, the authorities in Shenzhen, Guangdong Province were more than willing to get involved.

The natural reaction of masses of Hong Kong's populace may have been useful for the Chinese hardliners. The question now exists whether Xi can and will secure enough to move against his own party's hardline faithful. One thing is sure. He needs outside help to make this happen. Washington and Donald Trump's holding fire so far has been a help. How long that can last is the question!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Isis, Islam, Intervention

By
Reality on the ground is often quite different than what appears in news commentary and even Executive Department briefing papers. This is essentially true regarding terrorism in general. The statement has been made that ISIS has been effectively defeated in Syria and the Taliban reduced in strength in Afghanistan. These are the reasons for withdrawing U.S. military forces from these combat areas. Unfortunately, such a definitive circumstance is belied by the reality on the ground. To begin with, the various organized terrorist groups in the Middle East may have different names and even sponsors, but they all share the same strategic goal. They are all Islamic in character, desire to remove western influence/control from a chosen sector – and in one form or another ultimately gain dominance over economic assets such as oil production and sale. Sometimes the real ambition is simply to gain unrestricted power for power's sake. To complicate things further, the number of “soldie...
Post a Comment
Read more

Anatomy Of Terrorism

By
It is said that terrorism is the weapon of the weak against the strong. It's a saying that sounds good if one is seeking to defend or justify terrorist acts. However, it is just not true – at least if one is willing to consider blowing up a peaceful civilian structure as a terrorist act. The civilians in the building are hardly strong: they are defenseless and unprepared. The real strength lies with the terrorist bombers. They have all the advantages – weapons, organization, secrecy, initiative and commitment. Terrorism as a device is available to all. It's just a matter of utilizing a particular form of weapon for use in spreading fear while degrading the physical image of a something that is considered as playing part in the maintenance of order in an enemy's infrastructure. This means everything from community activity and edifices to their civil and security services. In other words, destabilizing any aspect of orderly life is a target. Of course, the military is not ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Russia And China From An Intel Standpoint

By
It must be a very difficult job to be a Russian or Chinese intelligence officer these days, It's not the strength of the opposition – though of course that's always a consideration. The main reason is the lack of clear purpose. The world - the secret world that they deal in – is much more complicated these days. Sometimes the old enemy for these well-practiced operators is viewed differently by the officers' own political superiors. Frankly, it must be very hard to keep up with the changing perceptions of the leader-class who themselves seem to be playing “outside the lines” of historical perceptions. Of course, there is a difference between the two countries, so we will discuss them separately. First, the Russians – While the Western press and novelists (often indistinguishable) remain preoccupied with the Russian of previous decades, much has changed both in form and spirit in the Russian security apparat. To begin with, the international charter of what once was th...
Post a Comment
Read more