Skip to main content

Special Operators - Who They Are And Who They Need To Be


Controversy has grown over President Trump's pardons, commutations and restoration of rank to several outstanding servicemen, veterans of special operations. Each case was different, but each shared the opprobrium heaped on them for acts deemed “un-American”. A more absurd statement cannot be imagined.
     
The basic problem is the lack of understanding of some observers of the nature of combat required against rabid, unconventional and often radical Islamist terrorist partisans. The well recognized Western rules of warfare as applicable to conventional wars just do not apply. The question is who the best individuals are to fight this complicated and often bloody war in which the anti-Western carry no hesitancies in their attempts to destroy those who do not follow their fanatical path. The men (and some women) who are chosen and trained to fight these unique enemies must have special characteristics to engage in these special operations.
     
To begin with, the personal and physical requirements are tested in all forms of individual and group settings. Importantly, the psychological aspects of such a volunteer are tested and challenged before and during this period of assessment and assignment. In other words, the importance of stability is judged against necessary initiative and balanced speed of decision-making. These and other basic issues are determined in a wide context. Of course, mistakes can be made, but multiple crossover assessments work to reduce these potentialities.
      
Special operations require dependable yet versatile personnel. Ultimately each operator must have a physical and mental toughness that defies normal limitations.  This sounds extravagant, even perhaps exaggerated, but the reality is that it's all attainable with perfectly normal and even “ordinary” people. Yet these ordinary people have a motivational level far above “normal”. It's the drive and commitment of these special operators that separates them from the ordinary. Yes, they also evolve through training into outstanding physical individuals, but the same training simply places the physical into the high functioning tool of the psyche.
         
There really isn't anything new in this choice and training of intelligent, talented and courageous warriors. Julius Caesar and other great soldiers developed such cadre. These “special” fighters have existed through history. One doesn't have to go that far back for examples : (As mentioned in a previous article) Ethan Allen and his Vermont – New Hampshire  “Green Mountain Boys”  held their New England homeland against larger numbers of British regulars  and afterward were incorporated in  General George Washington's Continental Army as his first Ranger unit.  Fast forward to the heroes of the 2nd Ranger Battalion of WWII that climbed ropes hand over hand to scale the German controlled heights of Cap du Hoc that held a commanding position over Normandy Beach.
     
These feats can be and are done by special personnel of all American services as well as unsung “shadow” covert units behind the lines. They are hard in every meaning of the term, but they are also well above average intelligence, though not by traditional standards. This does not protect special operations from making mistakes, but it does ensure maximum intelligent effort. These are not your neighborhood toughs; they are the best of the best and are willing to die to prove it.
      
In the end the ultimate test of special operations as an arm of defense is a combination of unit and also national commitment! The latter is challenged by the traditional and even faith-based instinct of the American people to fight hard but fair. The latter character does not necessarily fit well into Special Operations methodology. Simply stated, the American civilian world is proud of its reputation and belief in a “fair fight”. The problem is that by definition, spec ops is not “fair”. The driving force of this form of warfare is that it is unexpected, out of character, and possibly even cruel by civilian standards
       
These days our special units have to be trained to fight in this manner. To the surprise of very few, the talent is within the American spirit. Frankly, this is how the nation was built. Special Operations was learned from the Native Americans. It is a lesson we forget at our peril.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Isis, Islam, Intervention

Reality on the ground is often quite different than what appears in news commentary and even Executive Department briefing papers. This is essentially true regarding terrorism in general. The statement has been made that ISIS has been effectively defeated in Syria and the Taliban reduced in strength in Afghanistan. These are the reasons for withdrawing U.S. military forces from these combat areas. Unfortunately, such a definitive circumstance is belied by the reality on the ground. To begin with, the various organized terrorist groups in the Middle East may have different names and even sponsors, but they all share the same strategic goal. They are all Islamic in character, desire to remove western influence/control from a chosen sector – and in one form or another ultimately gain dominance over economic assets such as oil production and sale. Sometimes the real ambition is simply to gain unrestricted power for power's sake. To complicate things further, the number of “soldie...

Russia And China From An Intel Standpoint

It must be a very difficult job to be a Russian or Chinese intelligence officer these days, It's not the strength of the opposition – though of course that's always a consideration. The main reason is the lack of clear purpose. The world - the secret world that they deal in – is much more complicated these days. Sometimes the old enemy for these well-practiced operators is viewed differently by the officers' own political superiors. Frankly, it must be very hard to keep up with the changing perceptions of the leader-class who themselves seem to be playing “outside the lines” of historical perceptions. Of course, there is a difference between the two countries, so we will discuss them separately. First, the Russians – While the Western press and novelists (often indistinguishable) remain preoccupied with the Russian of previous decades, much has changed both in form and spirit in the Russian security apparat. To begin with, the international charter of what once was th...

Anatomy Of Terrorism

It is said that terrorism is the weapon of the weak against the strong. It's a saying that sounds good if one is seeking to defend or justify terrorist acts. However, it is just not true – at least if one is willing to consider blowing up a peaceful civilian structure as a terrorist act. The civilians in the building are hardly strong: they are defenseless and unprepared. The real strength lies with the terrorist bombers. They have all the advantages – weapons, organization, secrecy, initiative and commitment. Terrorism as a device is available to all. It's just a matter of utilizing a particular form of weapon for use in spreading fear while degrading the physical image of a something that is considered as playing part in the maintenance of order in an enemy's infrastructure. This means everything from community activity and edifices to their civil and security services. In other words, destabilizing any aspect of orderly life is a target. Of course, the military is not ...