Skip to main content

China Uber Alles


The ASEAN Post is dedicated to covering all matters concerning the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. Recently this journal has been focused diligently on Chinese claims in the South China Sea. The fact is that the nations of that region have all been publicly drawing attention to the subject. The Peoples Republic of China (PRC) has vigorously pursued its ambition to control that entire waterway, and thus the region. Small and large islands in this oceanic region are targets for development by the Chinese in total disregard of the impact on historical interests and understandings of many regional countries. These include among others, Vietnam, Malaysia, Philippines, Taiwan and even Cambodia. Obviously, regional Western powers such as Australia, New Zealand, and even Great Britain with its traditional activity in that area are involved. Of course, the United States has maintained an economic and political interest and presence in that region since World War II. The truth is that many countries outside the region have interests requiring free access to the South China Sea.

Adding to the PRC's aggressive goal is the establishment of two administrative districts intended to govern this vast area. Where there are no natural islands to claim, Beijing has been constructing artificial islands at geographically strategic positions, a priority for China's technical people who seek to explore and exploit valuable oil and gas resources as well as deep water rare mineral deposits. Of course, there are also politically strategic reasons for this well-planned acquisition program. The combination of these goals actually provides Beijing with a panoply of negotiating positions when it comes to the expected international arguments to arrive. It's a very clever move. Establishing claims over wide areas of the South China Sea allows Xi Jinping's government to trade off for areas to which they have little or no legitimate sovereignty in the first place.

All of this is occurring during this period of the corona virus pandemic. This timing (purposeful or not) takes political military advantage of an issue of overwhelming international concern. The circumstance may be accidental, but it certainly is advantageous as the world's attention is elsewhere. However, the timing is purely accidental as China long has had its eyes on controlling this economically and politically important site in Southeast Asia.

There is little question that Beijing is well aware that their actions essentially challenge the American naval dominance in this area of the Pacific that has been of priority importance since WW ll. This is a critical issue in the relations between the two nations. It is surprising, therefore, that Beijing would pursue this competitive route with Washington at a time when cooperation on an economic basis is so important for both sides, though clearly more so for the PRC.



There have been many explanations and analyses put forth on the foregoing subject, but the truth may be far clearer than it appears. China's military has been forced to take a back seat during the period of Xi's leadership. Dominance over the South China Sea and the implicit challenge to the U.S. and its allies in the region is a reflection of the Chinese military/intelligence program to retain and increase its self-perceived and justified political dominance.

Parallel and not unconnected to their aggressive role in the South China Sea is the PRC's program called “Thousand Talents”. This extensive operation is aimed to penetrate the American and European world to acquire evolving methodology in all science fields to the point of even seeking to gain patents on new technology they have unearthed from Western university research with a particular targeting of the United States. Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton has done exceptional work in leading the charge to expose this extensive Chinese intelligence program. Former American ambassador to China, Jon Huntsman, has estimated that there are 350,000 Chinese students and other trained visiting “academics” in the U.S. The connection with Beijing's operations in the South China Sea is played out in the mode of penetration of the academic world where the islands to be exploited are intellectual rather than physical.

While easier to penetrate and exploit the American and European academic scene in order to steal emerging secret information, the “invasion” of the South China Sea and its environs by/for Chinese military and economic interests can be countered with an aggressive awareness and action by Western allies. However, they must be willing to confront overtly and covertly the new sophisticated form of Chinese aggression. This seems to require military and direct political action, something not yet seen – or perhaps even contemplated.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Isis, Islam, Intervention

Reality on the ground is often quite different than what appears in news commentary and even Executive Department briefing papers. This is essentially true regarding terrorism in general. The statement has been made that ISIS has been effectively defeated in Syria and the Taliban reduced in strength in Afghanistan. These are the reasons for withdrawing U.S. military forces from these combat areas. Unfortunately, such a definitive circumstance is belied by the reality on the ground. To begin with, the various organized terrorist groups in the Middle East may have different names and even sponsors, but they all share the same strategic goal. They are all Islamic in character, desire to remove western influence/control from a chosen sector – and in one form or another ultimately gain dominance over economic assets such as oil production and sale. Sometimes the real ambition is simply to gain unrestricted power for power's sake. To complicate things further, the number of “soldie...

Anatomy Of Terrorism

It is said that terrorism is the weapon of the weak against the strong. It's a saying that sounds good if one is seeking to defend or justify terrorist acts. However, it is just not true – at least if one is willing to consider blowing up a peaceful civilian structure as a terrorist act. The civilians in the building are hardly strong: they are defenseless and unprepared. The real strength lies with the terrorist bombers. They have all the advantages – weapons, organization, secrecy, initiative and commitment. Terrorism as a device is available to all. It's just a matter of utilizing a particular form of weapon for use in spreading fear while degrading the physical image of a something that is considered as playing part in the maintenance of order in an enemy's infrastructure. This means everything from community activity and edifices to their civil and security services. In other words, destabilizing any aspect of orderly life is a target. Of course, the military is not ...

Russia And China From An Intel Standpoint

It must be a very difficult job to be a Russian or Chinese intelligence officer these days, It's not the strength of the opposition – though of course that's always a consideration. The main reason is the lack of clear purpose. The world - the secret world that they deal in – is much more complicated these days. Sometimes the old enemy for these well-practiced operators is viewed differently by the officers' own political superiors. Frankly, it must be very hard to keep up with the changing perceptions of the leader-class who themselves seem to be playing “outside the lines” of historical perceptions. Of course, there is a difference between the two countries, so we will discuss them separately. First, the Russians – While the Western press and novelists (often indistinguishable) remain preoccupied with the Russian of previous decades, much has changed both in form and spirit in the Russian security apparat. To begin with, the international charter of what once was th...