Skip to main content

The Way It's Really Done

Image
By

A major issue has been made over the order to remove U.S. troops from Northern Syria. The fact is that these are not just regular American forces. These are in name and character Special Forces. Their actual number has been estimated by various “dependable “sources to be anywhere from 50 to 1000. There even have been “reliable” reports doubling the top number to 2,000 and reducing the bottom one to 25. Hogan Gidley, the White House Deputy Press Secretary stated,” only 28 people there”. Sometimes the brass screws up things so badly it actually works to confuse the enemy. Certainly, it has totally confused the American public. From a Special Forces standpoint, the result couldn't have been better.

The fact is that elements of the Special Forces have been working with Syrian Kurds for many years to control ISIS-targeted territory and the radical Islamist forces' ambition to enlarge their role in Syria and elsewhere. It was all covered under the rubric of “limited military action”. And the same term was initially used by Turkey to justify their own desire to create a “cordon sanitaire” along their border with Northern Syria. The truth is that the term “limited” military action is so ambiguous it is impossible to define accurately. There never was a possibility that the Turkish Army would be able to (or even want to) limit their action to a strictly demarcated area, but it sounded good. What's really crucial here is the preservation of the capability of American Army Special Forces units to operate in the Middle East and around the world dealing with often complicated and potentially dangerous larger conflict situations.

Hollywood has done its best to focus on the extravagant instances of real and possible SF action. But the truth about this elite very special force and its support units is well beyond the relatively simplistic characterization of popular film. To begin with it must be understood that these particular units operate in small groups, highly disciplined and extraordinarily capable. They are among the best that the United States Armed Forces produce. Their heritage reaches all the way back to the Revolutionary Mac and includes Ethan Allen and his “Green Mountain Boys” who became the first contingent of “rangers” in Washington's army. Their spirit draws from those who fought at Bunker Hill (actually Breed's Hill) who never retreated until they were out of ammunition in face of an overwhelming British assault. There have been many other small American units that have created the ethos of the ultimate American soldier. They do not leave their post nor abandon allies. Political issues aside, they never should have been ordered to abandon their positions and friends. This woeful order has been operationally amended – as it should have been.

Specialized U.S. forces serve around the world. The Navy, Marines, Air Force and even the Coast Guard have special units that do extraordinary things. These small contingents such as in Syria and elsewhere worldwide is why the rest of us live free today. America and its heroes do indeed protect the world though such a statement annoys even our allies. Ultimately, it is our destiny and honor.

What is not well understood by most U.S. citizens is that these forces have vowed to protect them along with the American Constitution wherever they are sent.  And they will and do die for that commitment. They are America's forward defense and are inheritors of all the heroes who have gone on before. It is not a Hollywood theatrical presentation emphasizing their uniqueness. The fact is that these men - and now some women – are organized into particular units extremely adaptable to the myriad of conflict situations. Their talents are exquisite, and their determination exceeds all measures. They truly are special forces. They can act as a true “force multiplier' especially when coordinated with close-in air support.

While Special Forces are excellent when utilized in the fashion they were created and structured, these troopers are wasted when their presence in a combat zone is for domestic political exploitation. Similarly, while political ramifications may affect their operations, SF units are weakened when they are forced to place the political ambitions of others ahead of their unit’s true military objectives. This is a danger that all military action faces, but in the use of these specialized troops the negative results can be substantially increased. The best guide an old Green Beret once offered was, “Go slow, go careful, then strike hard and fast. “He called it the “Cobra Technique”. It's an excellent guide in many fields.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Isis, Islam, Intervention

By
Reality on the ground is often quite different than what appears in news commentary and even Executive Department briefing papers. This is essentially true regarding terrorism in general. The statement has been made that ISIS has been effectively defeated in Syria and the Taliban reduced in strength in Afghanistan. These are the reasons for withdrawing U.S. military forces from these combat areas. Unfortunately, such a definitive circumstance is belied by the reality on the ground. To begin with, the various organized terrorist groups in the Middle East may have different names and even sponsors, but they all share the same strategic goal. They are all Islamic in character, desire to remove western influence/control from a chosen sector – and in one form or another ultimately gain dominance over economic assets such as oil production and sale. Sometimes the real ambition is simply to gain unrestricted power for power's sake. To complicate things further, the number of “soldie...
Post a Comment
Read more

Anatomy Of Terrorism

By
It is said that terrorism is the weapon of the weak against the strong. It's a saying that sounds good if one is seeking to defend or justify terrorist acts. However, it is just not true – at least if one is willing to consider blowing up a peaceful civilian structure as a terrorist act. The civilians in the building are hardly strong: they are defenseless and unprepared. The real strength lies with the terrorist bombers. They have all the advantages – weapons, organization, secrecy, initiative and commitment. Terrorism as a device is available to all. It's just a matter of utilizing a particular form of weapon for use in spreading fear while degrading the physical image of a something that is considered as playing part in the maintenance of order in an enemy's infrastructure. This means everything from community activity and edifices to their civil and security services. In other words, destabilizing any aspect of orderly life is a target. Of course, the military is not ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Russia And China From An Intel Standpoint

By
It must be a very difficult job to be a Russian or Chinese intelligence officer these days, It's not the strength of the opposition – though of course that's always a consideration. The main reason is the lack of clear purpose. The world - the secret world that they deal in – is much more complicated these days. Sometimes the old enemy for these well-practiced operators is viewed differently by the officers' own political superiors. Frankly, it must be very hard to keep up with the changing perceptions of the leader-class who themselves seem to be playing “outside the lines” of historical perceptions. Of course, there is a difference between the two countries, so we will discuss them separately. First, the Russians – While the Western press and novelists (often indistinguishable) remain preoccupied with the Russian of previous decades, much has changed both in form and spirit in the Russian security apparat. To begin with, the international charter of what once was th...
Post a Comment
Read more