Skip to main content

Speaking About Africa

In Africa there are very few people who speak of the continent as a singular place. The people of Africa joined and separated into hundreds if not thousands of various groupings well know they live in given countries in a large continent. But the truth is that their underlying loyalties are to family and tribe and that is how an ordinary African think of himself / herself. They may be Ghanaian, Nigerian, Sudanese, Congolese, etc. - and they do identify themselves as such when abroad, in their homeland they first think of themselves as tribal and sub-tribal members. Their loyalties begin with their extended family identity. Westerners who have lived among these people for the most part recognize them in that manner. Among Kenyans Barack Obama was viewed through his father's identity as a Luo. That he was the American President did not change his tribal identity in their minds. Those outsiders passing through - and this includes official observers and even journalists – tend to see only the immediately obvious whether it's the hotel facilities or the degree of professionalism of those who are paid to serve them. At best these visitors barely see and sense the essential character and concerns of those of the “interior”.

For these reasons, commentary on Africa as a unified whole is ultimately irresponsible and perhaps even specious. The first phase of what might be adjudged dissimulation occurred as a result of the various colonial powers insisting the colonies learn the language of their masters. This in turn brought about an artificial transformation of the surface culture of the region concerned. Legal documents of all kinds had to be in the colonial language along with the appropriate legal actions deemed appropriate. Educational institutions constructed by these European powers, of course, were again based on the appropriate colonial language and formulas. It is true, however, that in some areas generally accepted lingua franca such as Swahili was in common use among many tribes in East Africa. Nonetheless, English predominated in all serious colonial governmental affairs.

Interestingly, in today's independent Africa the colonial language tends to remain in general use, though more through convenience rather than any governmental necessity. However, indigenous language has regained its original importance and is certainly a factor in local political movements. These local languages and dialects stemming from them act to bring a sense of cohesion .Where there once was a social as well as a political discordance in speaking in tribal tongues, today both locally and nationally indigenous languages are no longer frowned upon  – although sometimes the more obscure becomes difficult for others to understand.  Nonetheless, these linguistic issues are worked out and it is accepted that in spite of these problems a greater true sense of independence evolves.

It is this sense of independence that drives all phases of African political life, but it also unfortunately returns old barriers and rivalries to the larger community that colonial control tended to diminish or obscure. A conspicuous example of an alternative arose many decades ago in South Africa where there evolved an entirely new language melding Dutch, German, French and even English with a smattering of other Euro and African languages. The use of Afrikaans, as it is known, stretched northward to a degree into Zimbabwe, Namibia and the bordering states. However, it did not become politically significant as one might suspect. In the Northeast African states where Islam has had a strong hold, Arabic has returned as a powerful linguistic and political tool.

It is true, however, that in most of the former colonial states, leaders tend to have a working fluency in the old colonial languages. Thus French, English, Italian, Portuguese and even a sprinkling of Spanish still can be heard, though the German of their pre-WWI colony of Tanganyika is rarely encountered. European language speakers in the political sphere in Africa find it both a convenience and a tool for dissimulation when they wish to. This is a device not unknown to European or even Asian history. In Africa language can open and close doors, sometimes at the same time.

XXXXX

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Isis, Islam, Intervention

Reality on the ground is often quite different than what appears in news commentary and even Executive Department briefing papers. This is essentially true regarding terrorism in general. The statement has been made that ISIS has been effectively defeated in Syria and the Taliban reduced in strength in Afghanistan. These are the reasons for withdrawing U.S. military forces from these combat areas. Unfortunately, such a definitive circumstance is belied by the reality on the ground. To begin with, the various organized terrorist groups in the Middle East may have different names and even sponsors, but they all share the same strategic goal. They are all Islamic in character, desire to remove western influence/control from a chosen sector – and in one form or another ultimately gain dominance over economic assets such as oil production and sale. Sometimes the real ambition is simply to gain unrestricted power for power's sake. To complicate things further, the number of “soldie...

Anatomy Of Terrorism

It is said that terrorism is the weapon of the weak against the strong. It's a saying that sounds good if one is seeking to defend or justify terrorist acts. However, it is just not true – at least if one is willing to consider blowing up a peaceful civilian structure as a terrorist act. The civilians in the building are hardly strong: they are defenseless and unprepared. The real strength lies with the terrorist bombers. They have all the advantages – weapons, organization, secrecy, initiative and commitment. Terrorism as a device is available to all. It's just a matter of utilizing a particular form of weapon for use in spreading fear while degrading the physical image of a something that is considered as playing part in the maintenance of order in an enemy's infrastructure. This means everything from community activity and edifices to their civil and security services. In other words, destabilizing any aspect of orderly life is a target. Of course, the military is not ...

Separating The Wheat From The Chaff

There has been an exponential growth in concern recently over various aspects of foreign affairs. Sometimes it's justified – sometimes not so. A good example was the proliferation of commentary on Emmanuel Macron's speech commemorating 100 years since the end of World War I. The French President presented the idea of the creation of a “European Army” implying an end to NATO. Usually thoughtful commentators rushed to find hidden meaning in the quote, “We have to protect ourselves in respect to China, Russia and the United States of America.” The most highly charged of the instant analyses was that this was some sort of personal attack on President Trump for chastising the NATO members for not maintaining their agreed two per cent of GDP defense budget. That theme morphed – with Macron's rhetorical help – into a challenge over Trump's support for nationalism. Variations of this journalistic theme swiftly emerged. Meanwhile, the obvious objective of Macron was overlo...