Skip to main content

A Note To Mr. Schiff


Part of the problem that various public figures have in understanding the circumstances of international contacts is the general lack of understanding of the professional intelligence world and how it operates. Most particularly is the impact that is made internationally by covert activity influencing foreign adversaries or expected adversaries. This is called political/psychological warfare. The modern application began directly after the end of World War Two and the evolution of the post-war intelligence services. The Russians had a leg-up on everyone else because their Communist Party already had a well-structured worldwide network. If anything, the Western nations have become much more sophisticated since then. Unfortunately, this sophistication and the strategy therein seems to have been missed by the Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Adam Schiff.

The immediate issue at hand is the much speculated and Schiff-driven argument as to whether President Donald Trump has had private contacts with the Russians. Unrecognized by Schiff and the general press is that this issue actually is an aid to the Russians. To take this matter further and make it clearer it is necessary to recognize that in the world of intelligence those who cooperate with a given service are considered either “witting” or “unwitting assets”. In fact, it is not necessarily a person, though it usually is. Schiff and his supporters have therefore become unwitting assets to Russian political warfare instruments. The efforts to undermine the President's leadership become a help to the Russians in selling the idea internationally that the Americans are too unstable a nation – and the President in particular – to be counted on. Of course, Mr. Schiff and his backers are essentially ignorant of this circumstance. Unfortunately, the reason for this ignorance is that they are blinded by their domestic political ambitions accompanied, most likely, by a lack of experience in the arcane elements of political/psychological warfare technique.

The more Schiff attacks, the more Trump and his people counterattack. This produces a situation where the U.S. appears disoriented and thus untrustworthy as protectors worldwide. This works exceedingly well in less-developed world terms. One wonders whether the Russian services have been able to use this ploy to influence inaction on the part of Mexico in respect to the massive flow of illegal immigrants into the United States. It would appear that for some reason Mexico City does not view the American concern as anything but an exaggerated response by an easily excitable U.S. President. Score one for the GU (reportedly the new acronym for what was GRU, the Russian intelligence organization chartered to handle such matters), even if they didn't originate the operations as a covert action.

The Russians are not the only ones who are able to take advantage of unwitting assets. We do it wherever we can and so do all the other major countries. One expects that all nations, if they have the capability, use such devices to their advantage whenever they can. To use a term of art, that is one of the real clear and present dangers. Of course, the Chinese know about the utilization of unwitting assets for they use the mechanism regularly in their commercial activities. In the particular case of Chairman Schiff's pursuit of pejorative information relative to Donald Trump, Beijing is staying as far away as they can. However, given the Chinese proclivity for the long view, they will find a way to use any leverage implicit in the circumstance if the need arises.

None of this would be new to the old hands in the intelligence business, even if it has escaped Adam Schiff. But frankly, is there anyone in Washington these days who understands any of this and the implications? Apparently not!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Game Of Games

There has been a great deal of discussion about how one or another major international figure, and other relatively minor ones, are “in the pocket” of this or that political entity. The fact is that all major governments have at their disposal organizations and individuals who specialize in these forms of deception often referred to as “disinformation”. In brief, this activity is simply a way to disseminate propaganda and sometimes even tactically false information for operational purposes. The entire activity has been a staple of rival governmental activity since the earliest of times. Essentially, this political weapon is based on human frailties that are then exploited by the opposing group. The alternatives are endless. It's both an offensive and defensive weapon. We have seen it used recently in the case of the coronavirus where many in the international community placed blame on the Chinese government seeking to embarrass Beijing. To protect themselves, the PRC respond...

After Action Report

The pandemic of the coronavirus (COVID-19) has exposed the shortcomings of numerous countries, but the profoundly communist Peoples Republic of China seems to have been caught up in its own political insecurity. As usual, the vastly over organized political structure of the PRC resulted in an initial effort to disclaim any role in the evolution of the new virus emanating from the city of Wuhan. At the same time worldwide, similar confused political elements sought to avoid placing blame for the siting of the virus on China - or at least quickly condemning those who did. The fact that it had been recognized in the first week or two of January – or even before that by American and other intelligence services that a new and serious epidemic had hit the city of Wuhan was kept from the public for well over a month in many cases and more in others. It appears that even Beijing's leadership were unaware of what their local security service had been reporting after they learned o...

Vlad Staying On

The West reacted predictably when Vladimir Putin announced he would stay in office after his current term was over. Of course, this was greeted with claims of “dictatorship” outside of Russia. These claims may be justified on the face but are not very insightful. To begin with, it is important to recognize that Putin's background, parentage and upbringing have been carefully confused in official rewriting. There are few facts that seem consistent. It seems fairly sure that his father was a mechanic, but he was raised by his grandparents in most reports. Who his mother was is disputed in several accounts, though there now seems to be agreement on Maria Ivanova Putin (family name: Shelonova). None of this seem to matter very much except that he came from a 'working class” family. What is important is the general agreement that Putka, as he was called in his early years, seemed to be fascinated by the organization of the secret police, the NKVD, as it was then called. It has...