Skip to main content

A Note To Mr. Schiff


Part of the problem that various public figures have in understanding the circumstances of international contacts is the general lack of understanding of the professional intelligence world and how it operates. Most particularly is the impact that is made internationally by covert activity influencing foreign adversaries or expected adversaries. This is called political/psychological warfare. The modern application began directly after the end of World War Two and the evolution of the post-war intelligence services. The Russians had a leg-up on everyone else because their Communist Party already had a well-structured worldwide network. If anything, the Western nations have become much more sophisticated since then. Unfortunately, this sophistication and the strategy therein seems to have been missed by the Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Adam Schiff.

The immediate issue at hand is the much speculated and Schiff-driven argument as to whether President Donald Trump has had private contacts with the Russians. Unrecognized by Schiff and the general press is that this issue actually is an aid to the Russians. To take this matter further and make it clearer it is necessary to recognize that in the world of intelligence those who cooperate with a given service are considered either “witting” or “unwitting assets”. In fact, it is not necessarily a person, though it usually is. Schiff and his supporters have therefore become unwitting assets to Russian political warfare instruments. The efforts to undermine the President's leadership become a help to the Russians in selling the idea internationally that the Americans are too unstable a nation – and the President in particular – to be counted on. Of course, Mr. Schiff and his backers are essentially ignorant of this circumstance. Unfortunately, the reason for this ignorance is that they are blinded by their domestic political ambitions accompanied, most likely, by a lack of experience in the arcane elements of political/psychological warfare technique.

The more Schiff attacks, the more Trump and his people counterattack. This produces a situation where the U.S. appears disoriented and thus untrustworthy as protectors worldwide. This works exceedingly well in less-developed world terms. One wonders whether the Russian services have been able to use this ploy to influence inaction on the part of Mexico in respect to the massive flow of illegal immigrants into the United States. It would appear that for some reason Mexico City does not view the American concern as anything but an exaggerated response by an easily excitable U.S. President. Score one for the GU (reportedly the new acronym for what was GRU, the Russian intelligence organization chartered to handle such matters), even if they didn't originate the operations as a covert action.

The Russians are not the only ones who are able to take advantage of unwitting assets. We do it wherever we can and so do all the other major countries. One expects that all nations, if they have the capability, use such devices to their advantage whenever they can. To use a term of art, that is one of the real clear and present dangers. Of course, the Chinese know about the utilization of unwitting assets for they use the mechanism regularly in their commercial activities. In the particular case of Chairman Schiff's pursuit of pejorative information relative to Donald Trump, Beijing is staying as far away as they can. However, given the Chinese proclivity for the long view, they will find a way to use any leverage implicit in the circumstance if the need arises.

None of this would be new to the old hands in the intelligence business, even if it has escaped Adam Schiff. But frankly, is there anyone in Washington these days who understands any of this and the implications? Apparently not!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Congo Op - A True Story

The request (order?) to travel back to the Congo (renamed Zaire) came from an unexpectedly high echelon in Washington. It was set forth in simple terms but there was no doubt as to its political importance. The son of the chairman of the South African Stock Exchange had left his post as an officer in the elite British cavalry regiment, The Blues, to join the mercenaries battling against the Soviet-backed African rebels in the eastern Congo. Technically, Gary Wilton had not resigned his commission in one of the two regiments that comprise the Queen's Household Calvary, but nonetheless had taken an “extended leave” without authorization. To make this long story shorter let's just say this action had created possible international implications as well as considerable family distress. Enter an experienced American government professional who had “worked” Africa quietly for some years and was thought to be able to handle this diplomatically embarrassing affair. At the very least h...

China Uber Alles

The ASEAN Post is dedicated to covering all matters concerning the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. Recently this journal has been focused diligently on Chinese claims in the South China Sea. The fact is that the nations of that region have all been publicly drawing attention to the subject. The Peoples Republic of China (PRC) has vigorously pursued its ambition to control that entire waterway, and thus the region. Small and large islands in this oceanic region are targets for development by the Chinese in total disregard of the impact on historical interests and understandings of many regional countries. These include among others, Vietnam, Malaysia, Philippines, Taiwan and even Cambodia. Obviously, regional Western powers such as Australia, New Zealand, and even Great Britain with its traditional activity in that area are involved. Of course, the United States has maintained an economic and political interest and presence in that region since World War II. The truth is that ...

What's Next With Iran

In the middle of this October Iran will regain the legal right to rebuild their conventional weapon capability under terms of the JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action) first agreed upon by the Obama Administration and subsequently rescinded by the Trump Administration. Nonetheless, the other members of the agreement still recognize the original terms. This means that the Tehran government will be enabled to use a broad array of non-nuclear weapons to coerce, control or even invade neighboring countries. The term “conventional” can be interpreted to include ordnance and support elements of considerable capability, just so that it is not nuclear related. Secretary of State Michael Pompeo stated on Fox News recently that the United States could “handle” this new situation. Unfortunately, he didn't expand on that statement. Effectively, the entire issue is operationally tied to Iran's ability to make deals – usually financial. Iran never has had a problem with arranging ...