What
would you do if you were Kim Jong Un? To begin with, you would be worrying that
your always aggressive-minded military leaders were getting nervous over
Beijing seeming to weaken in their dealings with the United States. Of course,
some would say the Chinese really haven't given up much militarily in exchange
for some strictly economic deals. Unfortunately for Kim, that sort of logic
doesn't go very far with DPRK defense types who still believe the best defense
is the threat of a growing offensive capability. This mentality is underpinned
by these same NK generals having a long record of offensive actions - both
overt and covert.
Kim
cannot be overly sympathetic to Donald Trump's current involvement in
reelection politics. It has been well explained to the North Korean leader that
the U.S. president is constrained during the forthcoming year in what he can
offer in exchange for limited DPRK reductions/promises in advanced weapon
development – and that is clearly what Washington wants. At the same time Kim
does not want to lose the “friendly” pose he created with Trump. The
announcement of a “Christmas surprise” may have satisfied the more aggressive
elements in Pyongyang, but it certainly pressed the edges of the desired
“friendly” pose. The fact is that the American president needs to have at least
a quiescent Pyongyang if not a clear movement toward peace-making gestures
toward Seoul.
That
is the difficult - some would say dangerous - situation in which Kim Jong Un
and his advisers find themselves. Oddly enough, Trump is in approximately the
same position of having nothing but bad or inadequate choices. The current
Washington Administration cannot be seen as offering too much for too little,
while Kim and his group must satisfy their “hawks” that forward movement with
the American problem is less important militarily and diplomatically than
Beijing and Xi Jinping would want at this time. Yet one does not stay in power
in Pyongyang by appearing to be a patsy for Washington - or perhaps even
Beijing!
The
Americans seemed to have taken in their stride the recent firing of two
short range (200 -250 mile) missiles, but that does not negate the potential
impact of the test firing of a long range, possibly solid fuel, nuclear-capable
more advanced missile. This would be the New Year late “Christmas present”. The
problem facing Kim is one that forces him, on one hand, to avoid embarrassment
by doing nothing of conspicuous potential, or take the chance that the
Americans will choose to characterize this test firing as a serious challenge
for which they must respond definitively. Kim and most of his military advisors
think in this presidential year Donald Trump would have no other alternative
than to show instant toughness. In any case, Kim has no choice but to test the
American position by initiating a second or even third, possibly veiled
challenge. Or worse, the challenge might not be veiled at all.
From
Kim's standpoint Donald Trump cannot afford to have another crisis on the North
Korean front during an election year; that is if he and his advisors believe
the American Democrat Party would be able to blame it on the Republican Trump.
It becomes obvious Kim and Pyongyang in general must carefully watch the trends
in American politics to decide which party would give them greater leverage.
Would encouraging the American president to act precipitously be an advantage
to the North and could that be used to take advantage of a Democrat reaction?
Of
course, this sort of analysis depends on just how sophisticated Kim and his
advisors are able and willing to play with the American political scene. Going
tough at this stage may satisfy Kim Jong Un's right wing, but further softening
of relations with Washington carries the possible economic advantages for a
lessening of sanctions. On the other hand, appearing to be weak by acquiescing
to Washington interests of most any kind certainly carries the potential of
endangering Kim's own ruling position in Pyongyang. While this is going on Big
Brother China has its own interests in manipulating the DPRK's future.
Seems
like an appropriate time for a good stiff drink or maybe some Valium all
around.
Comments
Post a Comment