Skip to main content

Venezuela Rumbles

Image
By

The volcano that is Venezuela is rumbling and appears on the brink of explosion. Trying to stay ahead of the crisis in Venezuela is not easy. While matters appear to be coming to a head, even the issues post-Maduro must also be faced. First, it's important to review what went wrong with a country awash in oil revenue. Hugo Chavez died in March 2013 before he could complete his ambition of remaining until 2025 as Venezuela's leader. Nicholas Maduro won a special election the following month and took over Chavez’s authoritarian government. The well-rewarded military leadership fell in line despite a seriously falling economy.

Maduro won reelection in May 2018 by a mere 1.6% of the vote reflecting the discontent with the security-controlled system originally established by Chavez and continued under his successor. The reelection was immediately declared as unfair by opposition forces led by National Assembly head, Juan Guaidó. The latter declared himself President of Venezuela on January 23, 2019 less than two weeks after Maduro's inauguration.  In an obvious anti-Maduro action, the United States recognized Guaidó on the same day.

Guaidó's position has been countered legally on the basis of the procedures of the newly-created (2017) National Constitutional Assembly made up of Maduro regime loyalists. Effectively, Maduro has ruled through his hand-picked instrument backed by security forces and extravagantly paid military leaders. An effort by Maduro to buy off (or rent) the military rank and file was only moderately successful when various units charged with controlling protests edged themselves aside.

The key to the future can be found in the U.S. decision to evacuate its diplomatic staff and close its embassy in Caracas. The principal in this action was actually stated by Secretary of State Michael Pompeo when he said, “....the presence of the U.S. diplomatic staff at the embassy has become a constraint on U.S. policy.” This was far less a statement of diplomatic policy than it was a clear warning of the possibility of some form of military or paramilitary action.

Maduro of course was aware of this possibility and already charged Washington with sabotaging the Venezuelan economy and infrastructure. In this, dictator Maduro was not exactly wrong – except that it has not yet been put into effect. The internal breakdown was already in process for strictly economic and political reasons in Venezuela due to his own government's ineptness and structural inability to serve its own civilian population. The problem that exists for the forces of democracy is that the politically loyal Venezuelan security forces aided by certain privileged military units still maintain control of the country. To counter this there must be a concerted effort to undermine the existing totalitarian dominance.

The latter effort has been a significant part of the President-in-waiting Juan Guaidó's trips around Latin America explaining his position and hopefully lining up support for what most everyone sees coming down the pike. The question remains, however, what Cuba and Russia will do if the “balloon goes up” in Venezuela. China is not a real problem as far as Washington is concerned. The Administration thinks it knows what Beijing wants. It's just the price that needs to be discussed and agreed upon. In truth, that may be also the case with Havana and Moscow. It's amazing how international politics is influenced by ancillary considerations.

In the final analysis, Washington is facing a serious test of its support for democracy in Venezuela and elsewhere in the world. The question must be asked, however, whether the radical political elements in the United States are willing and able to support the idea of full-scale commitment to democracy if it includes overt and/or covert action. Or is the New Left, seeking to direct US politics, so involved with their rather self-serving interpretation of socialism that they will follow the Cuba/Russia line? It will be an interesting test of all involved and may also affect the 2020 Presidential election.  

One imagines that there is a great deal of angst being generated around the world as has been shown by the recently declared non-interventionist stance of the European Union. Wasn't that a lesson the members should have learned and remembered from their own experiences pre-WWII? Oh yes, the Russians and their lackeys always conveniently sought to have us forget that experience so long as it suited their interests. It's odd how that ploy sometimes still seems to work with those who don't appear to remember history. What is that line about those who forget history and are therefore condemned to repeat it?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Game Of Games

By
There has been a great deal of discussion about how one or another major international figure, and other relatively minor ones, are “in the pocket” of this or that political entity. The fact is that all major governments have at their disposal organizations and individuals who specialize in these forms of deception often referred to as “disinformation”. In brief, this activity is simply a way to disseminate propaganda and sometimes even tactically false information for operational purposes. The entire activity has been a staple of rival governmental activity since the earliest of times. Essentially, this political weapon is based on human frailties that are then exploited by the opposing group. The alternatives are endless. It's both an offensive and defensive weapon. We have seen it used recently in the case of the coronavirus where many in the international community placed blame on the Chinese government seeking to embarrass Beijing. To protect themselves, the PRC respond...
Post a Comment
Read more

After Action Report

By
The pandemic of the coronavirus (COVID-19) has exposed the shortcomings of numerous countries, but the profoundly communist Peoples Republic of China seems to have been caught up in its own political insecurity. As usual, the vastly over organized political structure of the PRC resulted in an initial effort to disclaim any role in the evolution of the new virus emanating from the city of Wuhan. At the same time worldwide, similar confused political elements sought to avoid placing blame for the siting of the virus on China - or at least quickly condemning those who did. The fact that it had been recognized in the first week or two of January – or even before that by American and other intelligence services that a new and serious epidemic had hit the city of Wuhan was kept from the public for well over a month in many cases and more in others. It appears that even Beijing's leadership were unaware of what their local security service had been reporting after they learned o...
Post a Comment
Read more

Vlad Staying On

By
The West reacted predictably when Vladimir Putin announced he would stay in office after his current term was over. Of course, this was greeted with claims of “dictatorship” outside of Russia. These claims may be justified on the face but are not very insightful. To begin with, it is important to recognize that Putin's background, parentage and upbringing have been carefully confused in official rewriting. There are few facts that seem consistent. It seems fairly sure that his father was a mechanic, but he was raised by his grandparents in most reports. Who his mother was is disputed in several accounts, though there now seems to be agreement on Maria Ivanova Putin (family name: Shelonova). None of this seem to matter very much except that he came from a 'working class” family. What is important is the general agreement that Putka, as he was called in his early years, seemed to be fascinated by the organization of the secret police, the NKVD, as it was then called. It has...
Post a Comment
Read more