Skip to main content

Special Operators - Who They Are And Who They Need To Be


Controversy has grown over President Trump's pardons, commutations and restoration of rank to several outstanding servicemen, veterans of special operations. Each case was different, but each shared the opprobrium heaped on them for acts deemed “un-American”. A more absurd statement cannot be imagined.
     
The basic problem is the lack of understanding of some observers of the nature of combat required against rabid, unconventional and often radical Islamist terrorist partisans. The well recognized Western rules of warfare as applicable to conventional wars just do not apply. The question is who the best individuals are to fight this complicated and often bloody war in which the anti-Western carry no hesitancies in their attempts to destroy those who do not follow their fanatical path. The men (and some women) who are chosen and trained to fight these unique enemies must have special characteristics to engage in these special operations.
     
To begin with, the personal and physical requirements are tested in all forms of individual and group settings. Importantly, the psychological aspects of such a volunteer are tested and challenged before and during this period of assessment and assignment. In other words, the importance of stability is judged against necessary initiative and balanced speed of decision-making. These and other basic issues are determined in a wide context. Of course, mistakes can be made, but multiple crossover assessments work to reduce these potentialities.
      
Special operations require dependable yet versatile personnel. Ultimately each operator must have a physical and mental toughness that defies normal limitations.  This sounds extravagant, even perhaps exaggerated, but the reality is that it's all attainable with perfectly normal and even “ordinary” people. Yet these ordinary people have a motivational level far above “normal”. It's the drive and commitment of these special operators that separates them from the ordinary. Yes, they also evolve through training into outstanding physical individuals, but the same training simply places the physical into the high functioning tool of the psyche.
         
There really isn't anything new in this choice and training of intelligent, talented and courageous warriors. Julius Caesar and other great soldiers developed such cadre. These “special” fighters have existed through history. One doesn't have to go that far back for examples : (As mentioned in a previous article) Ethan Allen and his Vermont – New Hampshire  “Green Mountain Boys”  held their New England homeland against larger numbers of British regulars  and afterward were incorporated in  General George Washington's Continental Army as his first Ranger unit.  Fast forward to the heroes of the 2nd Ranger Battalion of WWII that climbed ropes hand over hand to scale the German controlled heights of Cap du Hoc that held a commanding position over Normandy Beach.
     
These feats can be and are done by special personnel of all American services as well as unsung “shadow” covert units behind the lines. They are hard in every meaning of the term, but they are also well above average intelligence, though not by traditional standards. This does not protect special operations from making mistakes, but it does ensure maximum intelligent effort. These are not your neighborhood toughs; they are the best of the best and are willing to die to prove it.
      
In the end the ultimate test of special operations as an arm of defense is a combination of unit and also national commitment! The latter is challenged by the traditional and even faith-based instinct of the American people to fight hard but fair. The latter character does not necessarily fit well into Special Operations methodology. Simply stated, the American civilian world is proud of its reputation and belief in a “fair fight”. The problem is that by definition, spec ops is not “fair”. The driving force of this form of warfare is that it is unexpected, out of character, and possibly even cruel by civilian standards
       
These days our special units have to be trained to fight in this manner. To the surprise of very few, the talent is within the American spirit. Frankly, this is how the nation was built. Special Operations was learned from the Native Americans. It is a lesson we forget at our peril.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What's Next With Iran

In the middle of this October Iran will regain the legal right to rebuild their conventional weapon capability under terms of the JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action) first agreed upon by the Obama Administration and subsequently rescinded by the Trump Administration. Nonetheless, the other members of the agreement still recognize the original terms. This means that the Tehran government will be enabled to use a broad array of non-nuclear weapons to coerce, control or even invade neighboring countries. The term “conventional” can be interpreted to include ordnance and support elements of considerable capability, just so that it is not nuclear related. Secretary of State Michael Pompeo stated on Fox News recently that the United States could “handle” this new situation. Unfortunately, he didn't expand on that statement. Effectively, the entire issue is operationally tied to Iran's ability to make deals – usually financial. Iran never has had a problem with arranging

Congo Op - A True Story

The request (order?) to travel back to the Congo (renamed Zaire) came from an unexpectedly high echelon in Washington. It was set forth in simple terms but there was no doubt as to its political importance. The son of the chairman of the South African Stock Exchange had left his post as an officer in the elite British cavalry regiment, The Blues, to join the mercenaries battling against the Soviet-backed African rebels in the eastern Congo. Technically, Gary Wilton had not resigned his commission in one of the two regiments that comprise the Queen's Household Calvary, but nonetheless had taken an “extended leave” without authorization. To make this long story shorter let's just say this action had created possible international implications as well as considerable family distress. Enter an experienced American government professional who had “worked” Africa quietly for some years and was thought to be able to handle this diplomatically embarrassing affair. At the very least h

Vlad Staying On

The West reacted predictably when Vladimir Putin announced he would stay in office after his current term was over. Of course, this was greeted with claims of “dictatorship” outside of Russia. These claims may be justified on the face but are not very insightful. To begin with, it is important to recognize that Putin's background, parentage and upbringing have been carefully confused in official rewriting. There are few facts that seem consistent. It seems fairly sure that his father was a mechanic, but he was raised by his grandparents in most reports. Who his mother was is disputed in several accounts, though there now seems to be agreement on Maria Ivanova Putin (family name: Shelonova). None of this seem to matter very much except that he came from a 'working class” family. What is important is the general agreement that Putka, as he was called in his early years, seemed to be fascinated by the organization of the secret police, the NKVD, as it was then called. It has